First, each team should play 18 games against the opposite league. This is consistent with the current schedule for all AL teams and several NL teams. Each division would play all teams in a designated division in the opposite league on a rotating, three-year basis. Here is how the divisional match-ups would look:
Year Divisions Play | NL East | NL Central | NL West |
AL East | 2013 | 2015 | 2014 |
AL Central | 2014 | 2013 | 2015 |
AL West | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 |
Based on this table, each AL East team would play each NL East team in 2013. Teams would play three of the teams at home and two of the teams on the road, or vice versa. There would also be one “rivalry” series that takes place every year based on geographic or historic match-ups. Those match-ups would be as follows:
AL Rival | NL Rival | AL Rival | NL Rival | AL Rival | NL Rival |
NY Yankees | NY Mets | Kan City | St. Louis | Toronto | Pittsburgh |
Chic WSox | Chic Cubs | Minnesota | Milwaukee | Detroit | Philadelphia |
LA Angels | LA Dodgers | Seattle | San Diego | Texas | Colorado |
Tampa Bay | Miami | Boston | Atlanta | Houston | Arizona |
Oakland | San Fran | Baltimore | Washington | Cleveland | Cincinnati |
Each match-up would take place on a rotating basis, with one team being at home one season and the other at home on the following year. On seasons when the team is playing their opponent’s division, both teams would have a home series.
Could this system work for inter-league play? If not, what suggestions would you have to improve the schedule starting in 2013?
No comments:
Post a Comment